In The News

Dana Nessel continues the fight for equal parenting rights.

A new kind of custody battle.

Battles involving child custody are often hotly contested between the parties.  These can also become very complicated, when the couples used donor genetic material (eggs or sperm) to conceive their child.  Now, thanks to the ruling in Obergefell (the Supreme Court’s same-sex marriage ruling), a new wrinkle has been added to these cases. 

A same sex couple in southeast Michigan finds themselves at the center of a new, and potentially ground breaking, area of law.  The parties are a lesbian couple who entered into a domestic partnership in New York and a civil union in Vermont.  They did these things before same-sex marriage became legal.  They then used a donor egg and sperm to have their children.  The parties have been co-parenting the children since birth.  Now the couple is splitting up and the birth mother is trying to deny our client parenting time with the children. 

There are two things particularly interesting about this case.  First, according to the Michigan Custody Act, the birth mother is not technically a parent.  This is so because she is not genetically related to the children, nor is she an adoptive parent.  Second, our client is the legal guardian of the children, meaning she may in fact have more legal rights to the children than the birth mother. 

The central issue is whether or not the court will recognize that because these women did all they could to be a family and co-parent each should be entitled to parenting time as though they had been married. 

Here is a link to a story done by Local 4.

 

FacebookTwitterGoogle+TumblrStumbleUponRedditLinkedInDeliciousShare

Leave a Reply

*